Guild Document "fabri tignuarii Portus CIL 06, 03660"

Permalink https://gdrg.ugent.be/guilddocuments/2647
Document name fabri tignuarii Portus CIL 06, 03660
Name variant (this document) Collegii fabrum / tignariorum et bisel/lariorum II
Standard name of the group fabri tignuarii Ostiae
English standard name carpenters
Standard reference CIL 06, 03660
References to other standard editions CIL 06, 03660 (p 3407) = CIL 06, 32994a = CIL 14, 04136
Source type inscription
Type of inscription honorary
Type of monument
Main location Ostia
Main province Italia: Regio 01, Latium et Campania
Main admininistrative district Latium et Campania (Regio I)
Post quem 101 AD
Exact date
Ante quem 300 AD
Notes on dating Date based on the absence of praenomina.
Corporate designation collegium
Internal institutions
Protectors
Collective action
Collective assets
Collective entitlements
Public recognition and privileges
Private duties and liabilities
Receive
Donate
Notes
Standard text of source
Collegii fabrum / tignariorum et bisel/lariorum IIIviri Portensi/um in urbe agentium Procu/lus Saturni[---] / Calpurnius [---] Inno/centius C(ai) l(ibertus) suis sumptibus / p(ecunia) p(osuerunt)
Translation … of the guild(s?) of carpenters/builders and bisellarii. Tthe triumviri of Portus acting in Rome Calpurnius … Innocentius, freedman of Gaius have set up (this monument) with money of their own expenses.
Notes on the source
The text is preserved only in a manuscript and is hard to interpret possibly because it was badly copied from a not very legible original (cf. Waltzing no. 2300; CIL 14, 4136). Presumably one or more lines preceded it containing the name of the honorand who was president, or praefectus or patronus of the collegium fabrum tignuariorum mentioned. Bisellarius refers to the right of a person to have a 'double seat' at public shows and is as such normally awarded by the city council. If we accept the reading collegii in the first line, it presumably refers here to a group within the larger collegium fabrum tignuariorum (cf. similarly the AE 1974, 123a for the title within the corpus negotiatorum fori vinarii, and compare CIL 5, 7618 for a magister Augustalis bisellarius). But given the problems in this text we could envisage it starting with colleg(iorum, in which case the bisellarii of Ostia would have been organised in their own collegium.
 
The dedicants (if the text can be accepted) were triumviri Portensium in urbe agentium (lit. 'the (commission of) three men of the (residents from) Portus acting in Rome'), but what that office entailed and wether is was an office within the guild of fabri tignuarii or a minor public office canont be made out (cf. Rohde 2012: 180, n. 560)