Guild Document "fabri Urbis Salviae AE 1993, 00595"

Permalink https://gdrg.ugent.be/guilddocuments/2891
Document name fabri Urbis Salviae AE 1993, 00595
Name variant (this document) [---] fabr(um) [---]
Standard name of the group fabri Urbis Salviae
English standard name craftsmen
Standard reference AE 1993, 00595
References to other standard editions Piceno-Ur, 00007 = AE 1993, 00595
Source type inscription
Type of inscription funerary
Type of monument panel
Main location Urbs Salvia
Main province Italia: Regio 05, Picenum
Main admininistrative district Picenum (Regio V)
Post quem 1 AD
Exact date
Ante quem 200 AD
Notes on dating Dated by Marengo 1990 based on paleography and the formula BM.
Corporate designation
Internal institutions quaestores?
Protectors patroni?
Collective action
Collective assets
Collective entitlements
Public recognition and privileges
Private duties and liabilities
Receive
Donate
Notes
The early date may be doubtfull, since it is based on paleographical grounds.
 
The inscription is very fragmentary. The Anonymus here documented had been quattuorvir and quaestor and had some connection to the fabri. Since he does not appear to have transcended the local level, the fabri in question are most likely also local and we are not dealing with an equestian praefectus fabrum.
 
The municipal institutions of Urbs Salviae are badly documented. We hear of:
 
a decurio (CIL 9, 5542; 5560)
a quaestor (AE 1993, 595 (this person))
an aedilis (CIL 9, 5539)
quattuorviri (CIL 9, 5538 ; 5540; 5543?; AE 1993, 595 (this person))
a quinquennalis (CIL 9, 5533; 6365)
a praetor quinquennalis (AE 1969/70, 00183a = EAOR-03, 78)
 
Curiously, while one of the decuriones is an eques romanus (CIL 9, 5542), and both the (praetores) quinquennales are high ranking imperial senators, one of the quattuorviri is explicitly a libertus (L. Annius L.l. Capriolus (CIL 9, 5538) and none are certainly ingenui.
 
The 'quattuorvirate' at Urbs Salvia is on the whole exceptional in Picenum (cf. Delplace 1983: 766-767). Other towns had duumviri. Delplace dismisses this as a remnant of Urbs Salvia's former history as a 'praefecture'. Marengo (1990), however, argues that the quattuorviri were not civil magistrates but representatives of private associations or a semi-religious association such as the octoviri documented in Firmum and Falerio or the tresviri recorded in Amiternum, and more widely the seviri (augustales). A lost inscription from Trea (CIL 9, 5655) may even have documented a 'quattuorvir Augustalis'.
 
This leaves two possible interpretations:
quattuorvir and quaestor are civic offices and the Anonymus was patron of praefectus of the local (collegium) fabrum
quattuorvir (augustalis) was a non-elite dignity confered on wealthy and honourable non-elites (as the augustalitas) and the Anonymus was quaestor collegii fabrum, a title documented for the collegium fabrum in Patavium (CIL 5, 2850; AE 1976, 235) and not uncommon also in other collegia.
Standard text of source
------ / [--- ] IIIIvịṛ [---] / [---] quaes[t- ---] / [---] fabr(um) [---] / [--- coniu]gi b(ene) m(erenti) [---] / [--- et] sibì [---]
Translation … quattuorvir … quaestor? … patron? of the craftsmen … to her(?) well deserving husband … and her/himself …
Notes on the source