Guild "fabri navales Portus?"

Permalink https://gdrg.ugent.be/guilds/933
Main location Ostia
Main province Italia: Regio 01, Latium et Campania
Main administrative district Latium et Campania (Regio I)
Date
Early post quem 191 AD
Exact date
Early ante quem 195 AD
Late post quem 195 AD
Late exact date
Late ante quem 225 AD
Date notes
Category fabri navales
English standard name shipwrights
Sector crafts
Subsector shipbuilding
Specification
Status
Corporate designation corpus
Internal institutions tribuni? ; quinquennales perpetui? ; quinquennales ; honorati ; matres ; amatores ; plebs ; sesquiplicarii ; aeditimi ; immunes
Protectors patroni?
Collective action
Collective assets
Collective entitlements
Public recognition and privileges senatorial permission
Private duties and liabilities
Receive
Donate
Notes
Following Dessau (in CIL 14, p. 8) Waltzing (1895: II,77) supposed the existence of two separate guilds of shipwrights, resp. of Ostia and of Portus. He was followed by nearly all later scholars, including Meiggs (1997: 324; see Royden 1988: 30-33 for the discussion).
 
But Dessau's idea was based exclusively on an inscription mentioning a tribunus fabrum navalium Portensium who was also patronus of the fabri navales Ostiensium (CIL 14, 169; cf. also the almost identical later found inscription AE 1955, 177). Bloch (1953: 285) identified an album of a corpus fabrum navalium found in Portus (CIL 14, 256) as belonging to this guild, both because it was found in Portus and because there was little or no overlap in the names with another album found in Ostia near the temple of the 'fabri navales'.
 
Tran (2006: 314-316) notes that the lack over overlap is not telling much since we cannot date the inscription from Portus very accurately. He doubts the independent existence of the corpus fabrum navalium Portensium, separate from the corpus fabrum navalium Ostiensium (see note on the 'related documents').